Jesse Keating schrieb: > On Wednesday 03 January 2007 12:19, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> Actually I'd like to see this, too, but Fedora people seem to be so >> unwilling to support something like that so I tried the "better ask for >> something that's not that hard to realize and lies between the current >> solution and the best/ideal solution; maybe then the chances to get what >> we ask for are higher and it make one big part of the problem go away, >> even if parts of the problem remain"-approach > Well, we could do this, but it would involve an explosion of epochs :/ Our > ability to roll back package versions that were 'mistakes' is very very > useful. [...] Sorry, but we IMHO did something seriously wrong beforehand already if we have to roll back packages *after* test3. Cu thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
