On 1/3/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Luis Villa schrieb: > On 1/3/07, Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Thx Luis, I liked you mail. Some comments from my side: >> On 03.01.2007 09:59, Luis Villa wrote: >>> * QA: Ubuntu aggressively pushes people to use their development >>> branch and report problems, which leads to better, more stable final >>> releases. [...] >> Agreed. The biggest problem we have in this regard IMHO is that we >> always communicate "you can't get to stable release from rawhide or a >> test release". That scares people aways from the devel branch and the >> test releases. We should provide a clean solution so people at least can >> get from test3 to stable. > No, you should provide a clean path from every package ver X to every > package ver X+1. Period. [...] Actually I'd like to see this, too, but Fedora people seem to be so unwilling to support something like that so I tried the "better ask for something that's not that hard to realize and lies between the current solution and the best/ideal solution; maybe then the chances to get what we ask for are higher and it make one big part of the problem go away, even if parts of the problem remain"-approach ;-)
<shrug> I'm not (at least in this thread) trying to explain what Fedora *can* do; I'm trying to state what others *are* doing and where Fedora is falling short. Fedora may feel they can't do it for whatever reason, but others are doing it (or at least a reasonable fascimile of it), and seeing benefits from it, and Fedora should be aware of that. Luis _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
