On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Dave Jones wrote:
> If by "We", you really mean "you", then you'd be correct. FESCo,
> currently anyway, still allows kmods in limited cases.
Which was a mistake IMO.
Why?
To the best of my knowledge, the problem you have with kmods/alternate
kernels is that people complain when they break, and they fill bugzilla
with bugs that don't make sense -- because people don't understand that
they're running funky kernels.
Right? Are there any other reasons not to package these alternate
kernels?
Because that's a valid reason. But it also gives us something to shoot
for: better reporting tools.
--g
-------------------------------------------------------------
Greg DeKoenigsberg || Fedora Project || fedoraproject.org
Be an Ambassador || http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ambassadors
-------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
