On Wednesday 20 December 2006 14:06, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > Right? Are there any other reasons not to package these alternate > kernels? rpm completely fails as a method to track and deploy these things correctly. We've got HUGE ass workarounds that make packaging a complete nightmare. Add to that kmods will _always_ lag behind the kernel, by the very nature that they have to be built _after_ the kernel lands in a buildroot. Those are some technical reasons. There are many philosophical reasons too. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpcaQJVtfjgt.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
