On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:59:20AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote: > David Woodhouse wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:51 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > If we must. I think it's better to stick to "if it isn't upstream, it > > doesn't exist" though. > > > > We should make it clear we don't want _any_ kmod packages in the new > > combined Core+Extras too. > > If by "We", you really mean "you", then you'd be correct. FESCo, > currently anyway, still allows kmods in limited cases. Which was a mistake IMO. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
