David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:51 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
Personally, I'm voting for "don't bother".
This is a bad idea. We're encouraging fragmentation, and discouraging
the proper upstream path.
Absolutely.
If specific open source groups want to do
pre-upstream testing of kernel packages, let them make their own
unofficial repos. We'll link to them in our wiki.
If we must. I think it's better to stick to "if it isn't upstream, it
doesn't exist" though.
We should make it clear we don't want _any_ kmod packages in the new
combined Core+Extras too.
If by "We", you really mean "you", then you'd be correct. FESCo,
currently anyway, still allows kmods in limited cases.
-- Rex
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
