On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 11:51:35AM -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 12:47 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wednesday 20 December 2006 11:40, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > If it is experimental, > > > let's call it just that. > > > > Some of these things are not 'experimental' as in "If it works, it may be > > included". Some of these things will never be included, so to call them > > experimental is not right. > > > > How about dontuse. Pretty clear right? > > Personally, I'm voting for "don't bother". > > This is a bad idea. We're encouraging fragmentation, and discouraging > the proper upstream path. If specific open source groups want to do > pre-upstream testing of kernel packages, let them make their own > unofficial repos. We'll link to them in our wiki. Hallelujah. Preach on brother spot. Until your post, I felt like I was in one of those movies where I wake up and I'm the only person left alive. Except in this movie, I was the only one who hadn't lost his mind. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
