On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:55:19PM +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2006-12-20 at 11:51 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote: > > Personally, I'm voting for "don't bother". > > > > This is a bad idea. We're encouraging fragmentation, and discouraging > > the proper upstream path. > > Absolutely. +1 > > If specific open source groups want to do > > pre-upstream testing of kernel packages, let them make their own > > unofficial repos. We'll link to them in our wiki. > > If we must. I think it's better to stick to "if it isn't upstream, it > doesn't exist" though. +1 > We should make it clear we don't want _any_ kmod packages in the new > combined Core+Extras too. Um, no. We've been over this before. Changing the location of code in a SCM doesn't change any of the previous discussions. I don't particularly like it, but *shrug*. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
