On Wed, 2006-12-06 at 09:49 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:44 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:18 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > > > > For all packages that i) Fedora is the upstream[1] and ii) provide > > > content in /usr/share/doc, we need to ensure that: > > > > > > a. The content is licensed under the OPL only, and > > > b. The OPL is used without restrictions > > > > Um... why? > > Because the only open source license Fedora uses for > content/documentation is the OPL without options. > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/ > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Licensing/FAQ > > When we did the relicensing earlier this year, we forgot to check > packages where we are the upstream. Ah, I had misread your original email and thought you meant that OPL was the license that had to be used for the entire package, not just the content under /usr/share/doc. Sorry for the noise. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
