On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 16:44 -0600, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:18 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > > For all packages that i) Fedora is the upstream[1] and ii) provide > > content in /usr/share/doc, we need to ensure that: > > > > a. The content is licensed under the OPL only, and > > b. The OPL is used without restrictions > > Um... why? Because the only open source license Fedora uses for content/documentation is the OPL without options. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal/Licenses/ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject/Licensing/FAQ When we did the relicensing earlier this year, we forgot to check packages where we are the upstream. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
