Re: Re: Licensing audit for Fedora Extras

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 12:18 -0800, Karsten Wade wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-12-05 at 13:36 -0600, Tom 'spot' Callaway wrote:
> 
> > Its more of a process of:
> > 
> > A) Download SRPM
> > B) rpm -ivh foo.src.rpm
> > C) rpmbuild -bp path/to/foo.spec
> > D) Note License in foo.spec
> > E) Manually look through all source code in BUILD/foo
> > F) Note actual licensing where it differs from License
> > G) Ensure that license(s) is/are FSF or OSI approved
> 
> For all packages that i) Fedora is the upstream[1] and ii) provide
> content in /usr/share/doc, we need to ensure that:
> 
> a. The content is licensed under the OPL only, and
> b. The OPL is used without restrictions

Um... why?

josh

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux