On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 13:53 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On 11/27/06, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 13:38 -0500, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > > I'm not a fedora hater but I am a corporate distrust-er and I'm > > unconvinced that we're not extremely vulnerable to some 'pull it off the > > wire' bullshit like we HAVE seen in the past. > > > > how hard would it be for a executive at rh to tell all the RH members of > > whatever committee: > > - you will vote this way, you are not allowed to tell anyone why, and > > if you quit you're still bound by the NDA. > > > > I've thought about this a bit too, honestly I think the only way to > move forward is to trust the people you're working with. Be they IBM, > Red Hat or some freshman in high school. If they've proven > themselves, they've proven themselves. And even though people can do > strange things when their job is on the line, we can always fork. > Trust people? I'd be happy to trust 'people'. It is the legal documents they have signed that I do not trust. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
