On Mon, 2006-11-27 at 13:38 -0500, Greg Dekoenigsberg wrote: > >> Well, I agree with that in general. But I suspect if we don't have a "at > >> leat xx% need to be non-redhatters" rule a lot of people will say "this > >> is just another round in the never ending Red Hat game where they say to > >> get the community involved without giving them rights". I'd like to > >> avoid that. > > The rebuttal is simple. "All members of F-star are elected by the > packaging community, the majority of whom do not work for Red Hat." > > When the truth is on your side, use it. The Fedora haters will not be > convinced no matter what we say or do. > I'm not a fedora hater but I am a corporate distrust-er and I'm unconvinced that we're not extremely vulnerable to some 'pull it off the wire' bullshit like we HAVE seen in the past. how hard would it be for a executive at rh to tell all the RH members of whatever committee: - you will vote this way, you are not allowed to tell anyone why, and if you quit you're still bound by the NDA. -sv _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
