Thorsten Leemhuis (fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > * the Chair has veto rights -- that means the particular decision or > topic is transfered to the Fedora Project Board for further guidance and > considerations > > * two seats are special for a representative from the Community > Committee and a representative from Red Hat (see below for backgrounds > of these groups); both have veto rights, too; this positions are not > bound to special persons; it would be good if always the same persons > from the committee's shows up, but if they are not able to they can send > someone else from the committee as stand-in. Mm, this sets things up for all sorts of fun fights. > * at least 50% of the seats need to be filled by community members. ... > * have at least one fourth of their members from the community/from Red > Hat (exception: Red Hat/Community committees) How does mandated minimums lead to a meritocracy-style structure? (if you really want to use a loaded term, you could say 'quotas' here) Bill _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
