On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 11:19 -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > DW> I personally happen to think that 'package-monkey' is a perfect > DW> term > > ... see "code monkey", which is used to describe people who know > little about CS that produce generic code to spec: As I said, it seems to be a perfect fit. I have respect for those who give up their time to build packages for Fedora, even if they lack the skills to fully maintain those packages. I have less respect those who claim to be insulted by something as innocuous as the term 'package-monkey'. I think this particular line of discussion is not very fruitful -- if you have a sensible suggestion for an alternative term which fits the bill as well as 'package-monkey' then please feel free to offer it. Otherwise, let's just assume that these people are adults and can deal with it. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
