Re: Architecture Policy.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2006-11-18 at 21:36 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I'm just asking that we change one thing at a time. Get the new
> process
> working, and _then_ we can move PowerPC to it. After we've done a
> proper
> release for IA64 or SPARC or Alpha. 

I'd agree with this. PPC should be a secondary arch for a variety of
reasons, none of which having to do with its code quality.

Lets give SPARC a chance to succeed in the FC-7 time frame, get the
framework built up, and once that is done, we'll move PPC over. Less
moving pieces in a reorg is always good.

~spot

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux