Re: Architecture Policy.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "TC" == Tom 'spot' Callaway <tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

TC> I'd agree with this. PPC should be a secondary arch for a variety
TC> of reasons, none of which having to do with its code quality.

Oddly, I can't think of a really good reason why it shouldn't be a
primary arch.  Is it really that much overhead for us?  And if it is
made secondary, is there any path for it to make it back to primary
status?  What would the criteria be?

 - J<

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux