On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 11:35 -0500, seth vidal wrote: > I have a suggestion, David. Stop referring to our active and appreciated > volunteers as package monkeys. If you cannot refer to them respectfully > in public then do not do it at all. It's not a term of disrespect. It's a term which I use to refer to myself as well in certain circumstances. A package maintainer is able to work on the package, fix bugs, co-operate and contribute to upstream maintenance. A package-monkey can just build it and can't really do much else. I've recently tried to get rid of packages for which I can only be a package-monkey, and declined to accept new packages on similar grounds. I see no reason to get worked up about the terminology. -- dwmw2 _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
