Jesse Keating wrote:
On Thursday 16 November 2006 16:48, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said:
Sure, but how can you tell? How can you tell what somebody might have
done to get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up
in an iso?
So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build
it? Why would someone go to that much effort?
I don't know, but I just think a blanket "built from Fedora sources can be
Fedora" is a bit too far reaching. "Built from Fedora sources by Fedora
tools" seems a bit safer to me, but still should get board approval to use
the logo/trademark.
Or just "Ask us. We're nice people and we love you."
--Chris
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
