On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 16:57 -0500, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thursday 16 November 2006 16:48, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > Sure, but how can you tell? How can you tell what somebody might have > > > done to get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up > > > in an iso? > > > > So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build > > it? Why would someone go to that much effort? > > I don't know, but I just think a blanket "built from Fedora sources can be > Fedora" is a bit too far reaching. "Built from Fedora sources by Fedora > tools" seems a bit safer to me, but still should get board approval to use > the logo/trademark. How do you conclusively prove that? You'd have to keep mock build logs for every binary in that release for people to look at. josh _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
