On Thursday 16 November 2006 16:48, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > Sure, but how can you tell? How can you tell what somebody might have > > done to get from point A) source rpms to point B) binary rpms wrapped up > > in an iso? > > So, you'd ship a system that doesn't use the bits you use to build > it? Why would someone go to that much effort? I don't know, but I just think a blanket "built from Fedora sources can be Fedora" is a bit too far reaching. "Built from Fedora sources by Fedora tools" seems a bit safer to me, but still should get board approval to use the logo/trademark. -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpTPKoFfZuNh.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
