Re: Fedora Alternatives (Re: build service)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Michael Schwendt schrieb:
> On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 22:09:33 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
>>> There's no comment that explains this.
>>> Can we please require packagers
>>> to explain such unusual things in the spec file?
>> Talk to the packaging committee please. That really their business. I'm
>> all for it.
> Then simply back up the proposal and forward it appropriately as part of
> FESCo seeking guidance by the packaging committee. Some people in FESCo
> are part of the packaging committee even.

I forwarded the whole discussion to the Packaging Committee. See:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2006-November/msg00024.html

CU
thl

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Outreach]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora KDE]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux Audio Users]

  Powered by Linux