On Sat, 11 Nov 2006 14:49:16 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > Thus I'm more and more > wondering if we we should re-evaluate the "Fedora Alternatives" idea > that got buried. Users of stable releases that want a bit more up2date > stuff could get in there, while users that are a careful stick to the > main distro, and users that like some risks use devel. > > But we have some much on our plate currently, thus I don't think it'll > be wise to discuss that now. So? Rest assured, it would be wise. Much wiser than the current crap in FE, where we have packages which conflict with other packages in Core or Extras _explicitly_. _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
