Hi! Bill Nottingham schrieb: > Interesting idea (although this does date from last year): > http://en.opensuse.org/Build_Service my 2 cent on this one: I don't think we should get into similar business. We know Fedora best and we should only build for Fedora and related distros. But some open source projects may soon start to say "the latest package for Fedora can be found on the opensuse build-serice servers in their own repo at URL" (see also http://abock.org/2006/11/10/opensuse-build-service/ ). If users start to use to much of that stuff they might sooner or later end in the well known repo-mixing problems. I'd like to avoid that, because people will complain Fedora and/or yum are broken/bad. Thus I'm more and more wondering if we we should re-evaluate the "Fedora Alternatives" idea that got buried. Users of stable releases that want a bit more up2date stuff could get in there, while users that are a careful stick to the main distro, and users that like some risks use devel. But we have some much on our plate currently, thus I don't think it'll be wise to discuss that now. CU thl _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
