To be honest, I find stallman's answers quite confusing!
From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FreeSoftwareAnalysis/FSF: > * Would it be possible for the FSF to go through our packaging > guidelines at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines and the > packages included in Fedora Core and Fedora Extras aside from our own > licensing audit and point out clear or potential issues with it?
We can certainly go through the guidelines. We have not yet done so, but we know of one problem in the current policy: it says that packages can be included which qualify as open source but not as free software. In other words, not all packages need to meet the definition of free software.
Ok, why not add "free (with source codes) and opensource software" in FE guidelines to satisfy this criteria ? chitlesh -- http://clunixchit.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
