I don't think that providing two logo options, one restricted and one free, is necessary or wise. I think we would be much better off carefully establishing rules and guidelines for the usage of one logo. It will take work and will probably require ongoing adjustments, but I believe we can create rules and guidelines for the official mark that will allow appropriate usage within the community without even having to ask for permission in most cases. If we provide two options, we'll likely end up in the same situation as Debian, where everyone recognizes only one of the marks. -- Patrick "The N-Man" Barnes nman64@xxxxxxxxx http://www.n-man.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/nman64 Have I been helpful? Rate my assistance! http://rate.affero.net/nman64/ --
Attachment:
pgp6tCfsYEYgZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
