Alex Maier wrote:
On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 08:27 +0530, Rahul wrote:
That was what I was referring to earlier as brand dilution.
Allow me to respectfully disagree. Brand dilution will not happen from
giving the community a logo they can legally play and get creative with.
It will rather happen if we do not, and the community has either one of
two choices:
1. Use our one and only logo illegally, i.e. without our
permission, and in contexts where we would rather not have it
used;
2. Come up with their own version, which we all know can involve
puppies wearing blue hats.
If we provide a sane framework for Fedora logo use, we will only
strengthen our brand.
Except that noone would bother applying for permission to use the
official logo and would just use the "open" logo for all purposes. What
is the use of having a official logo nobody is going to associate with
Fedora easily?
Or have you had any difficulty recognizing the Debian logo and what it
stands for?
The official Debian logo would be totally unrecognizable without the
tagging in the open use logo as part of it. Seriously, how many people
have ever seen it being used with Debian?
Rahul
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list
fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
