On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 16:28 -0400, Christopher Blizzard wrote: > Honestly, I'm not sure we want to. What's the value in the integration, > migrating users and content? That's not without cost. And you can't > sell me on "integration for integration's sake." Also, talk to Bob Lord > (cced) to find out what's going on in Directory-land. I've been out of > the loop for a while. I cannot speak for Bob, naturally, but my experiencing working with his group is that they are interested in being integrated in meaningful ways with the Fedora Project beyond name only. What that means exactly needs to be worked out. We have to consider this kind of situation overall, esp. with the light of existing efforts/communities at jboss.org. Just like it doesn't make sense to pull in every thousands of projects in the world to be hosted on the One True Open Source Infrastructure, it probably doesn't make sense to force every Fedora sub-project to toe the same line. - Karsten, metaphoric mixmaster -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, 108 Editor ^ Fedora Documentation Project Sr. Developer Relations Mgr. | fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject quaid.108.redhat.com | gpg key: AD0E0C41 ////////////////////////////////// \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
_______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board-readonly mailing list fedora-advisory-board-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board-readonly
