On 11. 03. 22 10:36, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:14:31AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 11:01:20AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the
easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem.
This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads
that some of the ocaml packages are in fact already in CRB for RHEL
9.0, and others are not. We previously requested that all ocaml-*
packages be added to CRB.
Binary packages which are not in CRB but should be:
ocaml-calendar*
ocaml-camomile*
ocaml-csexp*
ocaml-csv*
ocaml-curses*
ocaml-dune*
ocaml-fileutils*
ocaml-gettext*
ocaml-libvirt*
ocaml-source
ocaml-xml-light*
Do you need a BZ opened to move these packages to CRB?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2060850
Currently even with this bug fixed we won't be able to build
Coccinelle until RHEL 9.1 is released, which is like 9+ months away.
This (if true) is ridiculous. Is there some other solution?
Given that EPEL 9 now builds against CentOS Stream, this is not necessarily true.
The other solution would have been to include the packages in CRB sooner :D
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
