On Fri, Mar 04, 2022 at 10:51:48AM +0000, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I'll see if we can move the OCaml packages to CRB. It seems to be the > easiest way to fix the original coccinelle build problem. This gets odder. I see from our internal spreadsheet and downloads that some of the ocaml packages are in fact already in CRB for RHEL 9.0, and others are not. We previously requested that all ocaml-* packages be added to CRB. Binary packages which are not in CRB but should be: ocaml-calendar* ocaml-camomile* ocaml-csexp* ocaml-csv* ocaml-curses* ocaml-dune* ocaml-fileutils* ocaml-gettext* ocaml-libvirt* ocaml-source ocaml-xml-light* Do you need a BZ opened to move these packages to CRB? (Insert here my monthly request that there be a single source of truth about packages.) Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org _______________________________________________ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
