On Mon, 2016-02-29 at 10:22 -0500, David Lehman wrote: > > > So basically it's another shoot-yourself-in-the-foot conundrum, with > > the standard choices? Leave the safety off, put a dumbass "Are you > > sure > > you want to do that?" message in front of it, or disallow it and > > annoy > > some partition pokemon with an implausible use case for it? > > > > Well hey, life sucks. I *think* my preference, if you asked my > > opinion, > > would be to disallow it and just say "if it's an empty partition you > > really want to make smaller, just do it in another tool or delete it > > and recreate it smaller". But if you think the balance here should be > > in favour of letting people shoot themselves in the foot, I'm not > > gonna > > argue it, and we'll just have to rewrite the criterion somehow. > I don't have a strong preference as to which corner-case we turn our > back on here. I do think that if this qualifies as a blocker under the > current criteria a rewrite/edit is definitely in order. OK. We have a blocker review meeting coming up in 90 minutes or so; I will propose that we adjust the criterion wording to apply only to known filesystems. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
