----- Original Message ----- > On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:01:35PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > So what we wound up doing instead was saying "you know what, no-one > > really *wants* these Product-specific network installs in any case. > > Everyone seems to be happy with us just officially shipping the Server > > one, with Server as the *default* package group but all the other > > package groups available, so the Server image also works for doing > > network installs of Workstation and Cloud. We want to make network > > install *possible* for particular use cases for those products, but it's > > not the primary distribution method and doesn't need a clever > > Product-specific image." (Really, what we're now calling the 'Server > > network install image' is pretty much exactly what the plain old > > 'network install image' was for all previous releases). > > I think if we decide to stay with this for F22, we should probably look > at just calling it the "generic network install image" (and maybe > asking Base WG if they want to own it). I can bring it to Base WG meeting as a topic next time. Jaroslav _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
