On Fri, Nov 07, 2014 at 02:01:35PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > So what we wound up doing instead was saying "you know what, no-one > really *wants* these Product-specific network installs in any case. > Everyone seems to be happy with us just officially shipping the Server > one, with Server as the *default* package group but all the other > package groups available, so the Server image also works for doing > network installs of Workstation and Cloud. We want to make network > install *possible* for particular use cases for those products, but it's > not the primary distribution method and doesn't need a clever > Product-specific image." (Really, what we're now calling the 'Server > network install image' is pretty much exactly what the plain old > 'network install image' was for all previous releases). I think if we decide to stay with this for F22, we should probably look at just calling it the "generic network install image" (and maybe asking Base WG if they want to own it). Or it's possible that the cloud/server/workstation WGs will really want to get into further-differentiated install defaults, in which case having separate ones _might_ make sense again -- although we could also just document to use updates=http://mirror.somewhere.fedora/foo/workstation/product.img if people want that. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
