Hey,
On 07/31/2014 04:28 AM, Vratislav Podzimek wrote:
The name and label are the least important items there so they should
probably be moved somewhere below the more important items (mount point,
size, device type, fs type).
Okay, thanks for the explanation guys!! - I didn't realize those fields
were that infrequently used (I definitely don't use them because I just
let the mount point field auto-populate them.) It makes a lot of sense
to push them down so that the more important fields under them are more
easily accessible, especially if you'd rather use the keyboard to navigate.
I came up with a few alternative designs based on that:
#2
This one is a simple reordering based on importance / frequency of use.
Although you'll note it comes across as a bit more cluttered than the
first mockup:
http://linuxgrrl.com/fedora-ux/Projects/Anaconda/Sketches/Move-Device-Selection-Custom-Part/after.2.png
#3
This one aligns stuff mroe tightly, and the label/name fields are
stacked. (I put name at the bottom bc I am pretty sure that gets greyed
out in some cases.) Still cluttered, but a bit less than the last one:
http://linuxgrrl.com/fedora-ux/Projects/Anaconda/Sketches/Move-Device-Selection-Custom-Part/after.3.png
#4
This is the cleanest one but a bit of a pain. Basically stashes the name
and label fields behind a disclosure. It might make a lot of sense to do
this if they are so rarely used:
http://linuxgrrl.com/fedora-ux/Projects/Anaconda/Sketches/Move-Device-Selection-Custom-Part/after.4a.png
http://linuxgrrl.com/fedora-ux/Projects/Anaconda/Sketches/Move-Device-Selection-Custom-Part/after.4b.png
What do you think?
~m
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
