On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 16:51 +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote: > На 29.07.2014 20:35, Máirín Duffy написа: > > Anyway here is the before (as it currently looks in RHEL 7.0 GA): > > http://linuxgrrl.com/fedora-ux/Projects/Anaconda/Sketches/Move-Device-Selection-Custom-Part/before.png > > > > > > And here is the after: > > http://linuxgrrl.com/fedora-ux/Projects/Anaconda/Sketches/Move-Device-Selection-Custom-Part/after.png > > > > Hi guys, > just my QA preference on this screen. > > > Name and Label are somewhat of secondary importance especially as they are > usually derived from the Mount Point path. The usual workflow is: > > * Select mount point > * enter size > * select fs type (usually left the default) > * select device type in case of LVM/RAID I agree with this, but I think device type is changed more often than fs type. Hardly anybody changes the fs type. The name and label are the least important items there so they should probably be moved somewhere below the more important items (mount point, size, device type, fs type). -- Vratislav Podzimek Anaconda Rider | RHCE | Red Hat, Inc. | Brno - Czech Republic _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
