Re: Stabilize anaconda development earlier in the cycle.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/14/2013 11:23 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Releng doesnt have the resources to deliver 3 releases a year.

For the core/baseOS ( very minimal package set ) I hardly doubt releng does not have enough resource + and a release would not be an "iso" release anyway more like an well tested grouped rebased platform update ( at least what I have in mind for FedoraOS ) in anycase if we dont solve this dilemma QA wont have resources to deliver multiple products and a no go stamp comes from QA on multiple products so hurray for lack of resources I guess ;)

As things stand now we either need to move anaconda ahead of developmen or behind the development to free up resources or plan pushing the testing of those products to their communities ( which based on the cloud testing experience for alpha they could not deliver so that's one "product" of the table then and there already ).

JBG

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list




[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux