On 10/08/2013 03:57 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:13:06PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
However I'm stilling working on that proposal and most likely it
will get killed in birth or shot on sight due to certain company's
focus on the three product proposal.
Why does everything have to be so oppositional?
Because everything seems to be already set in stone on the other side
with regards to the three product proposal as well as the proposal i'm
working on ( FedoraOS ) vs 3 product proposals are quite different (
fundamentally/ideally ) and would be not aligned to the Gnome release
cycle ( which seem to be the baseline for many ) but the kernel one
which means even faster release cycle ( 3x releases per year based on
the cycle of the components in addition to the kernel itself + a month
per release for us ) as well as it being a rolling release so as soon
as we release a fully tested FedoraOS as an platform it will obsolete
the other one.
In other words there will be only one FedoraOS GA release in circulation
( unless ofcourse we decide to maintain a single FedoraOS LTS release
between lts kernels releases as in FedoraOS based on 3.10 lts is EOL
when 3.18 or next LTS kernel gets released ).
But as I said I'm currently working on this proposal and with the
exception of how Anaconda would fit on top of the FedoraOS as well as 3x
release per year model, it's off topic for this list.
JBG
_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
