Re: Stabilize anaconda development earlier in the cycle.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 03:39:39PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> How are you going about guaranteeing rawhide is always consistent
> given different focus and moving parts?

More branches, possibly using COPRs. At a high level, revamping our
development process to support continuous delivery.

> >I think in general (not just anaconda) we_don't_  want development
> >happening on "X". That process should be about stabilization and qa. This
> >has traditionally been hard because Rawhide is too raw, but we have
> >efforts underway to make it less so, and if that solves non-theoretical
> >problems we can push harder on those efforts.
> Which efforts are those?

FUDCon Lawrence and following. See:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-March/179337.html


-- 
Matthew Miller  ☁☁☁  Fedora Cloud Architect  ☁☁☁  <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list





[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux