Re: Driver Disk version 3 format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 03:38 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:45 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 06:45 -0400, Martin Sivak wrote:
> > > I think we agreed on (and the code is checking for) Provides: kernel-modules-`uname -r`
> > 
> > Ok. I think we would ideally change it to use the other:
> > 
> > kernel-modules = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64
> > sym53c8xx-kmod = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx
> > kmod-sym53c8xx = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx
> > kmod-sym53c8xx(x86-64) = 2.2.3.rhtestxxxx-1.elx
> > 
> > But I could add the following:
> > 
> > kernel-modules-uname-r = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64
> > 
> > Otherwise, what would we have? The following perhaps:
> > 
> > kernel-modules-2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64
> 
> Martin, could you spin me a patched boot.iso against a recent nightly
> that uses kernel-modules = `uname -r`, or if you prefer having a new
> dependency, using instead kernel-modules-uname = `uname -r`?
> 
> I can do it myself, but I'm in another mostly all day meeting later,
> which is why I'm up at 3am to sort this stuff out first :)

I'm building a new test anaconda internally, on a private CVS branch. I
will post an updated build on an another list.

Jon.


_______________________________________________
Anaconda-devel-list mailing list
Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list

[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux