On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 03:38 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:45 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 06:45 -0400, Martin Sivak wrote: > > > I think we agreed on (and the code is checking for) Provides: kernel-modules-`uname -r` > > > > Ok. I think we would ideally change it to use the other: > > > > kernel-modules = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > sym53c8xx-kmod = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx > > kmod-sym53c8xx = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx > > kmod-sym53c8xx(x86-64) = 2.2.3.rhtestxxxx-1.elx > > > > But I could add the following: > > > > kernel-modules-uname-r = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > > > Otherwise, what would we have? The following perhaps: > > > > kernel-modules-2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > Martin, could you spin me a patched boot.iso against a recent nightly > that uses kernel-modules = `uname -r`, or if you prefer having a new > dependency, using instead kernel-modules-uname = `uname -r`? > > I can do it myself, but I'm in another mostly all day meeting later, > which is why I'm up at 3am to sort this stuff out first :) I'm building a new test anaconda internally, on a private CVS branch. I will post an updated build on an another list. Jon. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
