On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 05:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 03:38 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:45 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 06:45 -0400, Martin Sivak wrote: > > > > I think we agreed on (and the code is checking for) Provides: kernel-modules-`uname -r` > > > > > > Ok. I think we would ideally change it to use the other: > > > > > > kernel-modules = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > > sym53c8xx-kmod = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx > > > kmod-sym53c8xx = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx > > > kmod-sym53c8xx(x86-64) = 2.2.3.rhtestxxxx-1.elx > > > > > > But I could add the following: > > > > > > kernel-modules-uname-r = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > > > > > Otherwise, what would we have? The following perhaps: > > > > > > kernel-modules-2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > > > Martin, could you spin me a patched boot.iso against a recent nightly > > that uses kernel-modules = `uname -r`, or if you prefer having a new > > dependency, using instead kernel-modules-uname = `uname -r`? > > > > I can do it myself, but I'm in another mostly all day meeting later, > > which is why I'm up at 3am to sort this stuff out first :) > > I'm building a new test anaconda internally, on a private CVS branch. I > will post an updated build on an another list. In case anyone is interested, there is an internal git tree, CVS private branch, and some test builds containing the changed dependency that I will make into an ISO. I posted them to a certain list, and will send another update here after testing, maybe less cryptic than this one. Jon. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
