On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 08:45 -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > On Mon, 2010-03-29 at 06:45 -0400, Martin Sivak wrote: > > I think we agreed on (and the code is checking for) Provides: kernel-modules-`uname -r` > > Ok. I think we would ideally change it to use the other: > > kernel-modules = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > sym53c8xx-kmod = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx > kmod-sym53c8xx = 2.2.3.rhtest60b1-1.elx > kmod-sym53c8xx(x86-64) = 2.2.3.rhtestxxxx-1.elx > > But I could add the following: > > kernel-modules-uname-r = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 > > Otherwise, what would we have? The following perhaps: > > kernel-modules-2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 = 2.6.X-Y.elx.x86_64 Martin, could you spin me a patched boot.iso against a recent nightly that uses kernel-modules = `uname -r`, or if you prefer having a new dependency, using instead kernel-modules-uname = `uname -r`? I can do it myself, but I'm in another mostly all day meeting later, which is why I'm up at 3am to sort this stuff out first :) Jon. _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
