On Tue, 2008-08-26 at 10:37 +0300, Alexander Todorov wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA512 > > Radek Vykydal wrote: > | If you think that staying with install repo as default after > | installation is better, OK. I just thought that it should be done > | explicitly by user action (by enabling it), but perhaps there > | is no valid reason. > | > > hmm, what means default in this context? I can see repo(s) with low cost which > are preferred and then the stock repos (which point to mirrorlist). Both sets of > repos are enabled by default. If the local (install) one fails for some reason > (network failure, missing package) then yum will pick up the next repo and try > to work with it. > In the case other repos (i.e. not the install ones) have newer packages then yum > will use them automatically. Didn't know this, sorry for my ignorance. > I don't see how both types of repos we're > discussing conflict with each other. Please point me to a conflicting use case > if you're aware of such. > Then I don't have such and I'm OK with the patch. Radek _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
