On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:26 +0200, Radek Vykydal wrote: > Hi, > > > > > Good morning, > > anyone to review and comment on this patch please? > > > > The patch seems OK to me, but the policy of preference of repos > after installation should be thought about. I think > that the added install repos shouldn't be the preferred one - > I'd rather even disable it by default because disabled repo wouldn't > do any harm, and yet it could be useful. > > Option of controlling the preference with values of 'cost' seems too > fragile to me in this case. (Maybe we could let(force) the user set the > preference by a new (ks) option if he wants to have the repo > enabled after install.) > > My view is based only on wild guesses about typical install scenarios. > Why would you add a repo to your ks.cfg unless you wanted it to be preferred? -sv _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
