On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 10:52 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2008-08-25 at 16:26 +0200, Radek Vykydal wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Good morning, > > > anyone to review and comment on this patch please? > > > > > > > The patch seems OK to me, but the policy of preference of repos > > after installation should be thought about. I think > > that the added install repos shouldn't be the preferred one - > > I'd rather even disable it by default because disabled repo wouldn't > > do any harm, and yet it could be useful. > > > > Option of controlling the preference with values of 'cost' seems too > > fragile to me in this case. (Maybe we could let(force) the user set the > > preference by a new (ks) option if he wants to have the repo > > enabled after install.) > > > > My view is based only on wild guesses about typical install scenarios. > > > > Why would you add a repo to your ks.cfg unless you wanted it to be > preferred? > My concerns above was regarding the install tree repo (with baseurl of install method url) which is (for http/https/ftp methods) added to /etc/yum.repos.d by the patch, not repos added with "repo" to ks.cfg. > -sv > > > _______________________________________________ > Anaconda-devel-list mailing list > Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
