-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Radek Vykydal wrote: | If you think that staying with install repo as default after | installation is better, OK. I just thought that it should be done | explicitly by user action (by enabling it), but perhaps there | is no valid reason. | hmm, what means default in this context? I can see repo(s) with low cost which are preferred and then the stock repos (which point to mirrorlist). Both sets of repos are enabled by default. If the local (install) one fails for some reason (network failure, missing package) then yum will pick up the next repo and try to work with it. In the case other repos (i.e. not the install ones) have newer packages then yum will use them automatically. I don't see how both types of repos we're discussing conflict with each other. Please point me to a conflicting use case if you're aware of such. Thanks, Alexander. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Red Hat - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIs7LRhmd3WOiFct4RCvzbAKCXttXdQb9/7JLGVO4Etv4mp7oL6gCfeDwj bhy6yXe6DAy8TVnfbZ4Ii/w= =XXGh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Anaconda-devel-list mailing list Anaconda-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/anaconda-devel-list
