On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, John wrote: > > This turns out not to build well for the presence of the NPTL > > model kernel skews the build process, even within a chroot. > > I will confess to not having installed or used RHL 9. I don't understand > your reply: is there something in RHL 9's glibc that _requires_ a kernel > from RHL 9?. > > If that's a problem, then can one use a RHL 9 kernel in Valhalla? no -- the issue is deeper, as the tread model changes also affect, say, db4, and thence, rpm. The RPM list at RH, and the fedora list have gone through this in some depth within the last month, and so I will defer re-hashing it here once again. -- Russ Herrold
