Re: various anaconda observations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2 Jun 2003, R P Herrold wrote:

> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, John wrote:
> 
> > Install RHL 9 on a computer. Back it up using (maybe) tar.
> > Restart it somewhere into a directory on your workstation, maybe into
> > /var/local/RedHat/9
> > To do you work,
> > chroot /var/local/RedHat/9
> > 
> > If you want, you can start daemons and X in there. X offering a login
> > screen could be handy. To do that, you might want a second IP. If so,
> > configure (maybe) eth0:0 outside the chroot environment.
> > 
> > This will give you the appearance of running RHL 7.3 and RHL 9
> > simultaneously on the one computer.
> 
> This turns out not to build well for the presence of the NPTL 
> model kernel skews the build process, even within a chroot.


I will confess to not having installed or used RHL 9. I don't understand
your reply: is there something in RHL 9's glibc that _requires_ a kernel
from RHL 9?.

If that's a problem, then can one use a RHL 9 kernel in Valhalla?




-- 
Please, reply only to the list.

Join the "Linux Support by Small Businesses" list at
http://mail.computerdatasafe.com.au/mailman/listinfo/lssb





[Index of Archives]     [Kickstart]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Legacy List]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux