Michael Str?der wrote: > Rich Megginson wrote: >> Michael Str?der wrote: >>> Rich Megginson wrote: >>>> Michael Str?der wrote: >>>>> I really wonder whether default matching rules are applied for >>>>> certain LDAP syntaxes and how to find out which these are. >>>>> >>>> If there is no matching rule, it just goes by the most appropriate >>>> internal matching rule that corresponds to the SYNTAX. >>> >>> Any description how the "most appropriate internal matching rule" is >>> chosen? >> No, not really, afaik. I suppose it attempts to use "common sense" >> e.g. if the syntax is for case sensitive string, it uses a matching >> rule for case sensitive string comparison, and uses indexers for case >> sensitive strings. > > And how to determine whether a syntax is used for case sensitive > strings? That's exactly the problem of the original poster I guess. I think IA5String is case sensitive, and Directory String is case insensitive. > >>> Is the list of matching rules in the subschema subentry complete? >> Complete as in "implements every matching rule defined in every LDAP >> RFC" - no. > > Complete in the sense: The subschema subentry lists all the matching > rules which are implemented, no more, no less. Not sure. > > Ciao, Michael. > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080707/bb3c5478/attachment.bin
