Rich Megginson wrote: > Michael Str?der wrote: >> Rich Megginson wrote: >>> Michael Str?der wrote: >>>> I really wonder whether default matching rules are applied for >>>> certain LDAP syntaxes and how to find out which these are. >>>> >>> If there is no matching rule, it just goes by the most appropriate >>> internal matching rule that corresponds to the SYNTAX. >> >> Any description how the "most appropriate internal matching rule" is >> chosen? > No, not really, afaik. I suppose it attempts to use "common sense" e.g. > if the syntax is for case sensitive string, it uses a matching rule for > case sensitive string comparison, and uses indexers for case sensitive > strings. And how to determine whether a syntax is used for case sensitive strings? That's exactly the problem of the original poster I guess. >> Is the list of matching rules in the subschema subentry complete? > Complete as in "implements every matching rule defined in every LDAP > RFC" - no. Complete in the sense: The subschema subentry lists all the matching rules which are implemented, no more, no less. Ciao, Michael.
