Michael Str?der wrote: > Rich Megginson wrote: >> Michael Str?der wrote: >>> I really wonder whether default matching rules are applied for >>> certain LDAP syntaxes and how to find out which these are. >>> >> If there is no matching rule, it just goes by the most appropriate >> internal matching rule that corresponds to the SYNTAX. > > Any description how the "most appropriate internal matching rule" is > chosen? No, not really, afaik. I suppose it attempts to use "common sense" e.g. if the syntax is for case sensitive string, it uses a matching rule for case sensitive string comparison, and uses indexers for case sensitive strings. > Is the list of matching rules in the subschema subentry complete? Complete as in "implements every matching rule defined in every LDAP RFC" - no. > > Ciao, Michael. > > -- > Fedora-directory-users mailing list > Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 3258 bytes Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20080707/d31c8c90/attachment.bin
